Aetna Life Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Moser
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
The defendant Frederick C. Moser, at all times with which we are concerned, was a life insurance agent, under contract with the New York Life Insurance Company. He was a large producer, and frequently presented, risks larger than that company cared to underwrite. He was obligated, however, to submit to it any proposed risk, and give it the opportunity of accepting and underwriting the risk in whole or in part. In case the company accepted the risk only in part, defendant had the right to select the companies to which the balance of the risk should be submitted.
In the fall of 1934, defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- National Union Fire Insurance v. NasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Reed v. Union Central Life InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Ryder-Gougar Co. v. GarretsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Butler v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.