National Union Fire Insurance v. Nason
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHEY, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Defendant was for a term of years the general agent' for the plaintiff in the state of California. At the time of the trial the parties exchanged accounts, from which it appeared that the only difference between the parties was as to two items, the respondent claiming a credit of $925.23 for return of commissions retained by appellant from premiums on policies that were afterward canceled; and the appellant claiming a credit of $317.33 for commissions earned by him…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Schroeder v. MauzyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grimes v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Rainier Credit Co. v. Western Alliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Merrill v. Continental Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Rubel v. PeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.