Legal Opinion

Ryder-Gougar Co. v. Garretson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1909No. 7725PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Reid, J., entered June %, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to recover commissions retained by an agent after cancellation of an insurance policy.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This cause was tried by the court without a jury, at the conclusion of which it made findings showing the following main facts: The plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the insurance business at Tacoma, and at the time the facts occurred upon which this action is based, represented the “General Accident, Fire and Life Assurance, Company.” The defendants are partners, and also engaged in the insurance business at Tacoma. In August, 1907, the defendants, through the plaintiff, caused to be issued to Wilkeson Coal & Coke Company an employer’s liability insurance policy in said assurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. John Week Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fish v. Crawford Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Connolly v. BrunerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Lofton v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Codd v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Robbins v. Wilson Creek State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Kortright v. Mutual Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fifer v. Lynden Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Douglass v. StacheckiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API