Corporation of America v. Marks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after sustaining of defendants’ general demurrer to the third amended complaint without leave to amend.
The complaint is entitled Third Amended Complaint to Enforce and Foreclose Judgment Liens. It appears therefrom that plaintiff corporation procured two judgments against F. O. Marks in the Municipal Court of San Francisco for the aggregate sum of $1129.56. It caused abstracts of said judgments to be recorded in Orange County, and thereby secured a judgment lien upon the real property which is the subject of this action. F.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morton v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Nordstrom v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Wiley v. Santa Rosa BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lisenbee v. LisenbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Liuzza v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Walker v. DaviesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Belnap v. BlainUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Wellborn v. WellbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Young v. CharnackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.