Nordstrom v. Corona City Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action .to recover the sum of $3384.10 and interest from defendant as garnishee. The plaintiffs, nineteen in number, had, under the authority of section 1195 of the Code of Civil Procedure, joined in an action against one A. L. McConnell, as contractor, and defendant, Corona City Water Company, as owner, to foreclose mechanics’ liens for amounts claimed to be due the said plaintiffs for work done. On July 6, 1903, judgment was entered in said action, declaring that plaintiffs were not entitled to liens, but awarding them, severally, judgments against McConnell for different…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Lean v. GivensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Roberts & Co. v. LandeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Phillips v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Cogswell v. CogswellOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Corporation of America v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.