Legal Opinion
Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House Ventures
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 2010No. A125264PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Respondent Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. (HAFCI), filed a complaint against appellants Happening House Ventures (HHV) and David E. Smith alleging Smith had violated his fiduciary duties to HAFCI. HHV and Smith filed a motion to strike under the SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16),1 arguing that two of the causes of action HAFCI alleged must be dismissed because they were based in part on constitutionally protected activity. The trial court disagreed and denied the motion. HHV and Smith now appeal arguing the trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- City of Colton v. SingletaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.