City of Bemidji v. Ervin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered against them in an action for a declaratory judgment.
The basis for the action is in short this: Bemidji is a city governed by a home rule charter. The defendant Interstate Power Company has had a franchise under which it furnished the city and its inhabitants electric energy for light, heat, and power over a distribution system constructed and owned by the company under a franchise from the city which expired June 21, 1936. In March, 1937, the city council decided to take steps to acquire a municipally owned plant for the manufacture…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Le Tourneau v. HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Rice v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Struble v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Greenberg v. FornicolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.