Legal Opinion

City of Bemidji v. Ervin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1938No. 31,845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered against them in an action for a declaratory judgment.

The basis for the action is in short this: Bemidji is a city governed by a home rule charter. The defendant Interstate Power Company has had a franchise under which it furnished the city and its inhabitants electric energy for light, heat, and power over a distribution system constructed and owned by the company under a franchise from the city which expired June 21, 1936. In March, 1937, the city council decided to take steps to acquire a municipally owned plant for the manufacture…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Provo CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  4. Le Tourneau v. HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Rice v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Struble v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Greenberg v. FornicolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API