Legal Opinion

Le Tourneau v. Hugo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1903No. Nos. 13,767—(211)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Dibell, J., overruling a general demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action by a taxpayer to restrain and enjoin the city of Duluth from issuing the bonds of the city for the construction of a bridge over the ship canal situated therein, and from entering into the contract mentioned in the complaint for the construction of the same. A general demurrer was interposed to the complaint, which was sustained by the court below, and plaintiff appealed.

Two questions are presented for consideration in this court: (i) Whether Laws 1901 (c. 75) p. 79, under which the city proposes to issue the bonds in question is constitutional and valid; and (2) whether certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Murray v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Alexander v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Hetland v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. City of Saginaw v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Lodoen v. City of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Gould v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API