Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Kern County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1936No. Nos. 7924, 7974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

In each of two acitons brought by the county of Kern, Cal., to recover upon insurance policies given to insure it from loss due to burglary or robbery, the county recovered judgment in No. 7924 against the Maryland Casualty Company for the sum of $12,759.86, and in No. 7974 against the Glens Falls Indemnity Company for $21,266.43, representing their respective pro rata amounts of the sum of $34,026.29. The two cases were consolidated for trial. Separate verdicts and judgments were rendered against the respective companies. From each of these judgments, the defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Jacobs v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Mitchell v. LayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. San Diego County v. California Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. General Cas. Co. of America v. GunionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Hoblitzell v. HowardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API