Legal Opinion
Hoblitzell v. Howard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 8, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Stein, J. S. C.
Plaintiff, proceeding on order to show cause, seeks a preliminary injunction to accomplish, pendente Hie, the following results: viz., (a) the restoration to the plaintiff’s custody of the minute book and other records of *400the corporate defendant; (b) a restraint against the company and the defendants William C. Hoblitzell and W. Pranek Howard from using corporate funds to pay any legal or accounting fees or tax deficiency which may arise out of a certain tax investigation mentioned in the complaint; (c) a restraint against the defendants John E. Toolan and Joseph J. Seaman from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Timmons v. Security Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Heyward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- In Re Glover-McConnell Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1925
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Kern CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoblitzell v. HowardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954