Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Lay

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1930No. 6340PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This action is brought on the equity side of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by the appellee Helen Lay against the appellee Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Association, a Texas corporation, and resulted in the appointment of appellee as receiver for the Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Association. After appointment of a receiver the appellant was cited by him to appear in court to show cause why he should not be enjoined from further, proceeding with an- action in the superior court and from interference with the property of the Lumbermen’s.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Chapman v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Gas & Electric Securities Co. v. Manhattan & Queens Traction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cohen v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. Pianta v. H. M. Reich Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. West v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Johnson v. Manhattan Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. SeigelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API