Legal Opinion
In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 27, 2004No. 99-197 (TFH/JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court upon consent of the parties to a hearing regarding Chitivood & Harley’s Motion for Court Assistance in Allocating the Court’s Attorneys’ Fee Award Among Plaintiffs’ Counsel (the “Fee Dispute”) before a United States Magistrate Judge. A five-day hearing is currently scheduled for July 19, 2004.
An issue has arisen regarding the confidentiality of the hearing and the documents filed in preparation for it. 1 I am concerned that some of the documents and exhibits that Chitwood & Harley (“C & H”) and Cohen,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Harold D. Johnson, M.D. v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fudali v. Pivotal Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- CyDex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Alembic Global Holding SADistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Fudali v. Pivotal CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lansdale v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019