Fudali v. Pivotal Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Fudali is a former employee of defendant Pivotal who brought suit alleging that she was not paid an appropriate amount of commission based on a contract she negotiated between Pivotal and a third-party called Syngenta. A jury trial was held over the course of five days in October 2007. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and found that (1) Pivotal agreed to pay plaintiff under a compensation plan known as the “Channel Sale, Sales Executive & Senior Sales Executive Plan” (“Senior Sales Plan”); (2)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- In Re Application of National Broadcasting Company, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Cbs, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fudali v. Pivotal CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Fudali v. Pivotal CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Harney v. BLC Federal Way LH LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- In Re: McCormick & Company, Inc., Pepper Products Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017