Legal Opinion

Fudali v. Pivotal Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 5, 2009No. Civil Action 03-1460 (JMF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Fudali is a former employee of defendant Pivotal who brought suit alleging that she was not paid an appropriate amount of commission based on a contract she negotiated between Pivotal and a third-party called Syngenta. A jury trial was held over the course of five days in October 2007. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and found that (1) Pivotal agreed to pay plaintiff under a compensation plan known as the “Channel Sale, Sales Executive & Senior Sales Executive Plan” (“Senior Sales Plan”); (2)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. HubbardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Application of National Broadcasting Company, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Cbs, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fudali v. Pivotal CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Fudali v. Pivotal CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Harney v. BLC Federal Way LH LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  5. In Re: McCormick & Company, Inc., Pepper Products Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API