Legal Opinion
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 4, 2019No. 1:17-cv-00275Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. 17-275-LPS v. ) C.A. No. 17-1353-LPS ) OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, ) INC. and OXFORD NANOPORE ) TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Having reviewed Defendants’ Motion to Redact Portions of the August 14, 2019 Discovery Teleconference (the “Motion”) (C.A. No. 17-275 D.I. 340; C.A. No. 17-1353 D.I. 371) and the related submissions (C.A. No. 17-275 D.I. 341, 359; C.A. No. 17-1353 D.I. 372, 390), the Court DENIES the motion. The public has an interest…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In re: Avandia Marketing v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Littlejohn v. BIC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Mosaid Technologies Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.