Legal Opinion

Fudali v. Pivotal Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 5, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2003-1460Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MARJORIE FUDALI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 03-1460 (JMF) ) PIVOTAL CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Fudali is a former employee of defendant Pivotal who brought suit alleging that she was not paid an appropriate amount of commission based on a contract she negotiated between Pivotal and a third-party called Syngenta. A jury trial was held over the course of five days in October 2007. The jury rendered a verdict in favor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re Application of National Broadcasting Company, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., and Cbs, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. Stenograph L.L.C. v. Bossard Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API