Legal Opinion
Lansdale v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 10, 2018No. 0:16-cv-04106Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MICHAEL L. LANSDALE, Civil No. 16-4106 (JRT/BRT) Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. ORDER ON SEALING OF COURT’S SUMMARY UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, JUDGMENT ORDER INC., Defendant/Counter Claimant. Thomas E. Glennon, THOMAS E. GLENNON, P.A., 4900 IDS Center, 80 South Eighth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for plaintiff/counter defendant. Sarah B. C. Riskin, Jason Hungerford, Joseph G. Schmitt, and Donald M. Lewis, NILAN JOHNSON LEWIS PA, 120 South Sixth Street, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55402, for defendant/counter claimant. The Court previously…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. James B. McDougal Jim Guy Tucker Susan H. McDougal Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Radio-Television News Directors Association Capitol Cities/american Broadcasting Companies Cable News Network, Inc. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Cbs, Inc. Movants-Appellants v. Dow Jones and Company, Inc. Movant, William Jefferson Clinton, the President of the United States in His Official Capacity, Interested Party-Appellee. United States of America v. James B. McDougal Jim Guy Tucker Susan H. McDougal Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Radio-Television News Directors Association Capitol Cities/american Broadcasting Companies Cable News Network, Inc. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Cbs, Inc. Movants v. Dow Jones and Company, Inc. Movant, William Jefferson Clinton, the President of the United States in His Official Capacity, Interested Party-Appellee. Citizens United, Interested Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004