Hardison v. . Everett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.
Tbe defendant asserts tbat, as Y. Sidbury was tbe owner of tbe “Craig place” when tbe judgment was rendered in 1916, between Sidbury and Everett, Hardison, being tbe purchaser of tbe “Craig place” in controversy from Sidbury, since said judgment, is estopped by tbe judgment from claiming tbe land in controversy. Tbe plaintiff asserts tbat tbe record in Sidbury v. Everett, and tbe judgment in tbat cause, determined tbe northern boundary of Sidbury, as to lot No. 3 only, and did not involve title to lot No. 2, wbicb is now in dispute.
Estoppel by judgment is thus defined by Pearson, J., in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tyler v. . CapehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Armfield v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1852
- Coltrane v. . LaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Price v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Piedmont Wagon Co. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Leary v. . Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Queen City Coach Co. v. BurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Leary v. Virginia-Carolina Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Town of Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.