Legal Opinion

Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 7, 1963PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METZNER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are minority stockholders of General Motors Corporation who have based this derivative action against du Pont and General Motors primarily on matters involved in the government antitrust suit against these corporations and U. S. Rubber Co. United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 353 U.S. 586, 77 S.Ct. 872, 1 L.Ed.2d 1057 (1957). The final judgment in that case, entered on March 1, 1962, dismissed without prejudice the claims alleging violations of the Sherman Act, and adjudicated that du Pont’s acquisition of General Motors stock violated section 7…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Loomis v. ChurchIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. USLIFE Corp. v. U.S. Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
  3. Black Watch Farms, Inc. v. DickDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
  4. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Waterside Ocean Navigation Co., Inc., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, and International Navigation Ltd., Respondent-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Mecham v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API