Legal Opinion
De La Torre v. Merck Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 31, 2008No. CV-05-3987-PHX-ROSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 125) and Motion to Strike (Doc. 137). For the reasons below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Strike.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are uncontroverted or presented in a light most favorable to Plaintiff. 1 Defendant Merck Enterprises, Inc. (“Merck”) markets health products to hospitals, doctors, and pharmacies in the United States. (Defs.’ SOF ¶ 1.) Plaintiff Karen Da La Torre is 54-year-old woman who began…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Acosta v. Arizona, State ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Carmack v. American Workboats, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
- Carolina v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Farsakian v. KentDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Najib A. Hodge v. NAPA Genuine Auto Parts, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.