Farsakian v. Kent
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Aimee Farsakian, No. CV-20-00141-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Kent, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Aimee Farsakian moves for default judgment against Defendants David 16 Kent, D.O. (“Dr. Kent”), Phoenix Sands Surgical Associates, PLLC (“Phoenix Sands”), 17 Renew Medical Management, LLC (“Renew Medical”), Quantum Ventures Holdings, 18 LLC (“Quantum Holdings”), Quantum Ventures, LLC (“Quantum Ventures”), and 19 Quantum Business Solutions, LLC (“Quantum Business”) (collectively,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.