Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Arizona, State of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 29, 2024No. 4:22-cv-00096Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Danya Acosta, No. CV-22-00096-TUC-RCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant State of Arizona’s (“Defendant” or “the 16 State”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 49.) This matter has been fully briefed. 17 (Docs. 49–50, 53–54, 59–61.)1 The parties requested, and the Court held, oral argument 18 on May 28, 2024. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will deny the motion. 19 I. Factual Background 20 Plaintiff Danya Acosta…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API