Legal Opinion

In Re Rogers

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1900No. Crim. No. 682PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The petitioner was subpoenaed before the grand jury sitting in the city and county of San Francisco, and having been sworn as a witness before that body, there were propounded to him certain interrogatories. Upon his refusal to answer, the foreman of the grand jury made affidavit setting forth at length the questions which had been propounded to the contumacious witness, and stating that the body of which he was foreman was engaged in the consideration of a charge of felony against one John M. Chretien as to whether said John M. Chretien had forged the indorsement “John Sullivan” on a check.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte ZeehandelaarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. ThorneUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bradley v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cohen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Rogers v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API