Legal Opinion

Ex parte Zeehandelaar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1886No. 20230PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

The code requires the person on whom a writ of habeas corpus is served to make a return thereto; and if the party is detained by virtue of any writ, warrant, or other written authority, a copy thereof must be annexed to the return. (Pen. Code, sec. 1480.) *239Such a return has been made in this case, and the petitioner excepts to the sufficiency of it, because, as he insists, no legal cause is shown for his imprisonment. The return shows that during the progress of a trial in the Superior Court the petitioner was called and sworn as a witness, and was asked a question by the court, which he…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Rosato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Cohen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API