Travelers Indemnity Company, a Body Corporate of the State of Connecticut v. Rosedale Passenger Lines, Inc., a Body Corporate of the State of Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUTZNER, Circuit Judge:
Rosedale Passenger Lines, Inc., appeals from a judgment in favor of Travelers Indemnity Company which reimbursed Travelers for funds it paid to discharge a Baltimore City Court judgment against Rosedale. The district court held that Rosedale, Travelers’ insured, was estopped from asserting that it had forwarded suit papers to Travelers, and, accordingly, it denied recovery under the cooperation clause of the insurance policy.1 Because we believe that Travelers breached its duty to defend Rosedale and that the doctrine of estop-pel is inapplicable, we reverse.
Promptly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Meierdierck v. MILLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Tasea Investment Corp. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
- Schott v. Continental Auto Insurance UnderwritersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Himes v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reynolds v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Caruso v. Republic InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1983
- Tidewater Equipment Co., Inc. v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Nelson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Bobby S. Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.