Legal Opinion

Himes v. Day

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 1969No. [No. 261, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

The appellant (defendant below) appeals from a judgment by default entered against her individually, for failure on her part to file a responsive pleading in her individual capacity to a suit under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Code (1S67 Repl. Yol.) Art. 31A) brought against her individually and as Administratrix of the estate of John Raulin, deceased. The case against the appellant in her administrative capacity has not yet been decided.

The appellee, Johanna Day, who is a sister of John Raulin, deceased, filed the suit against the appellant, a daughter of John Raulin, alleging a cause of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tasea Investment Corp. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Smith v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Berwyn Fuel & Feed Co. v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. Schultz v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Pumphrey v. GrapesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Banegura v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Sprenger v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API