Legal Opinion
Schott v. Continental Auto Insurance Underwriters
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided September 4, 1930PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
“This is a suit in equity brought under Sections 1 and 2 of House Bill No. 53, enacted by Fifty-third General Assembly of Missouri, appearing at page 274, Laws of Missouri, 1925.
“Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, from which judgment the defendant, Continental Auto Insurance Underwriters, appealed. The defendant Midwest Transit Company, although served, made no appearance in the ease.
“The plaintiff is a resident of St. Joseph, Missouri. The defendant Continental Auto Insurance Underwriters, hereinafter referred to as the Underwriters, is a reciprocal or inter-insurance exehance,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Beakes v. . DacunhaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Davies v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- General Box Co. v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Barreras v. SantanaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.