Legal Opinion

Lenahan v. Lenahan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Among other things the appellant contends that the part of the final judgment of September 1, 1942, assigning the residue of the personal property of the testator in trust is coram non judice and void. It is her claim the testator did not contemplate setting up a trust and that the words of paragraph three did not create a trust, and since, on the date of judgment, the county court in probate had jurisdiction only over testamentary trusts, the creation of a trust by the judgment was an act beyond its jurisdiction.

The only persons interested in this estate, with the possible exception of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cline v. WhitakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Estate of WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pugh v. FowlieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Greatens v. LiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Will of BrandstedterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barry v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Holmlund v. La Crosse Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fritsch v. WepkingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Newport v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Chelminska v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API