Legal Opinion

Will of Brandstedter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, J.(1) The county court had power to construe the will in the final judgment so far as it was necessary in order to assign the estate of the testator. In fact the court could not assign the estate by the final judgment “without construing the will.” Estate of Lyons, 183 Wis. 276, 279, 197 N. W. 710.(2) The will was so ambiguous as to permit the introduction of proof that would aid the court in determining the intent of the testator. Under the presumption as to the regularity of- judicial proceedings, we must assume the proof taken when the final judgment was entered was confined to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frame v. PlumbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. O'Dell v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Estate of LyonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Triba v. LassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estate of WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  2. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Caskey v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Estate of GreenewayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API