Legal Opinion

Barry v. Richards

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The difficulty in this case arises from the manner in which the trust was created and administered and the lack of records reflecting its administration. The trial court observed in its written decision the defendant indulged in some questionable practices in respect to his duty as trustee and endeavored to co-operate with the widow and her family to the fullest extent and relied heavily on their mutual attorney. In approving the accounts, the trial court stated the defendant “rendered as accurate and detailed a report and account as available data made possible.” The basic questions are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Will of Leonard v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Joerres v. KoscielniakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Holmlund v. La Crosse Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. La Crosse Trust Co. v. HolmlundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Schuler v. CobeenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harold Patz Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  2. Alexopoulos v. DakourasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  4. Hallin v. HallinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Robert Hill Foundation v. LearmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API