Fritsch v. Wepking
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
We have recently held in a series of cases that the construction placed upon the provisions of a will by judgment or order is a finality, and that the court may not entertain a later petition for the construction of the will. Estate of Austin, 258 Wis. 578, 46 N. W. (2d) 861; Estate of White, 256 Wis. 467, 41 N. W. (2d) 776; Estate of Larson, 257 Wis. 579, 44 N. W. (2d) 535; and Estate of Lenahan, 258 Wis. 404, 46 N. W. (2d) 352. The question then is: Was the will construed in the judgment of December 12, 1939? If it was, there was no occasion for its construction upon the petition of the two…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Estate of WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Greatens v. LiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- La Crosse Trust Co. v. HolmlundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of GarbadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Fritsch v. WepkingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951