Legal Opinion

Fritsch v. Wepking

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

We have recently held in a series of cases that the construction placed upon the provisions of a will by judgment or order is a finality, and that the court may not entertain a later petition for the construction of the will. Estate of Austin, 258 Wis. 578, 46 N. W. (2d) 861; Estate of White, 256 Wis. 467, 41 N. W. (2d) 776; Estate of Larson, 257 Wis. 579, 44 N. W. (2d) 535; and Estate of Lenahan, 258 Wis. 404, 46 N. W. (2d) 352. The question then is: Was the will construed in the judgment of December 12, 1939? If it was, there was no occasion for its construction upon the petition of the two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Estate of WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Greatens v. LiebertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  4. La Crosse Trust Co. v. HolmlundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Estate of GarbadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Fritsch v. WepkingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API