Legal Opinion

Harden v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 27, 1926PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

At the special session of 1921 the General Assembly enacted a public-local law applicable to the counties of Buncombe and New Hanover, providing for the establishment of planning commissions in the cities and towns therein, and thereafter amended the act by including the county of Wake. P.-L. L., Ex. Ses. 1921, chaps. 169, 246. The powers thus conferred were enlarged and extended by a general law empowering cities and towns to adopt zoning and other regulations. Public Laws. 1923, ch. 250; 3 C. S., 2776 (r) et seq.

The plaintiff assailed these several acts and the ordinances adopted by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. State v. . VanhookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Rollins v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Anderson v. JesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. CG&T Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API