Kinney v. Sutton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
The zoning ordinance under consideration was adopted pursuant to the authorizing act, which was originally enacted by the General Assembly of 1923 and which is now codified as Article 14 of Chapter 160 of the General Statutes.
The appellant asserts initially that he is entitled to the certificate of occupancy sought by him as a matter of right because the proposed use conforms to the use regulations prescribed by the ordinance for the district in which the premises at 1122 East Morehead Street are situated.
The zoning ordinance does not expressly stipulate that property in a residence 2…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Forbes v. HubbardIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- City of Elizabeth v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Grace Baptist Church v. City of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.