Legal Opinion

Yoho v. Thompson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 2001No. 25273PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review a decision of the Court of Appeals holding the trial court properly limited cross-examination of a witness to exclude any reference to insurance. Yoho v. Thompson, 336 S.C. 23, 518 S.E.2d 286 (Ct.App.1999). We reverse.

FACTS

Petitioner Dorothy Yoho sued respondent Marguerite Thompson to recover damages for injuries she sustained when Thompson’s car struck Yoho’s car from behind. Prior to trial, Thompson’s insurer paid Yoho the policy limits of $50,000 and Yoho’s underinsured motorist carrier, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide), then…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Roger Charter, Individually and as Assignee v. William J. Chleborad, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Mills v. GrotheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. Bonser v. ShainholtzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CurtisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Vasquez v. RoccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Chambers v. Gwinnett Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API