Legal Opinion

Mills v. Grotheer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1998No. 88906PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Justice.

¶ 1 This appeal presents the issue of whether common membership in a mutual medical malpractice insurance company can be used to impeach a defense expert in a medical malpractice action. It is an issue of first impression. Other assignments of error have been raised. However, under the facts of this case no reversible error has been demonstrated.

¶ 2 This is a wrongful death ease in which Plaintiffs, Randy and John Mills, claim that Defendant, Dr. Martin H. Grotheer, M.D., was negligent in his care of their mother. At trial, Plaintiffs sought to impeach Defendant’s expert…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Jordan v. CatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Otwell v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance v. SvatySupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Bonser v. ShainholtzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. May-Li Barki, M.D., Inc. v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Lombard v. RohrbaughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API