Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLC

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2009No. 20080201PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 The Utah Health Care Malpractice Act requires a patient to bring a claim for malpractice no more than two years after the patient discovers or should have discovered the injury. We have interpreted this requirement to mean a patient must discover the legal injury-that is, both the fact of injury and that it resulted from negligence-before the statute of limitations begins to run. In this case, the plaintiff and appellant, Ralph L. Daniels, asks this court to determine whether under this discovery rule the statute of limitations period for his claim was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Greenway v. International Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1992
  5. Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Helf v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In re Estate of William J. HannifinUtah Supreme Court · 2013

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API