Legal Opinion

Tessitore v. Tessitore

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. 10033PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This appeal arises from a marriage dissolution action in which the trial court found that the defendant’s transfer by quitclaim deed to his parents of a two-thirds interest in the parties’ residence constituted a fraudulent conveyance in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1991) § 52-552.1 The defendant2 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, Ram*42say, J., claiming that (1) the trial court applied the wrong standard of proof in determining the fraudulent conveyance issue and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of a fraudulent conveyance. The defendant later amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Sands v. SandsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Tyers v. ComaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Daly v. Deptula (In Re Carrozzella & Richardson)District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  3. Cook v. BieluchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Pittman v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kaczynski v. KaczynskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API