Legal Opinion
Tyers v. Coma
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 20, 1990No. 13818PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, Hon. James T. Healey, state trial referee, refusing to set aside an allegedly fraudulent transfer of real property. The dispositive issues are: *9(1) whether the trial court failed to consider one of the two alternative tests required to establish a fraudulent conveyance; and (2) whether the trial court’s factual determinations are supported by the evidence. We find no error.
The trial court found the following: On July 31,1984, the Travelers Insurance Company paid the defendant Arzije Coma $115,000 in satisfaction of a workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Bizzoco v. ChinitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Citizens Bank of Clearwater v. Warren W. Hunt, Edward E. Hunt, and Sylvia C. Hunt, Edward E. Hunt and Sylvia C. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. CoopermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.