Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Pittman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1995No. 93-CA-00424-SCTPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

652 So.2d 1105 (1995)

James E. PITTMAN

v.

Claudine G. PITTMAN.

No. 93-CA-00424-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 30, 1995.

Jessie L. Evans, Blackmon Blackmon & Evans, Canton, for appellant.

Ross R. Barnett Jr., Barnett Law Firm, Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

PRATHER, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

I. INTRODUCTION.

On March 17, 1993, the Appellant, James E. Pittman (James), and the Appellee, Claudine G. Pittman (Claudine), were granted a divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable differences in the Chancery Court of Hinds County, First Judicial District. James, being aggrieved by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hemsley v. HemsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dillon v. DillonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hensarling v. HensarlingMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. R.K. v. J.K.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Anderson v. AndersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. A & L, INC. v. GranthamMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sarver v. SarverMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API