Legal Opinion
Keep Watson Cutoff Rural v. Kittitas County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 5, 2008No. 26202-2-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, J.*
¶1 RCW 36.70C.070(4) requires a party filing a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) petition to attach to the petition a copy of the decision being appealed. Here, the superior court dismissed Keep Watson Cutoff Rural’s (KWCR) LUPA petition for noncompliance with this requirement. KWCR appeals, contending the superior court had jurisdiction to reach the merits of the petition because (1) KWCR attached copies of the decisions being appealed, *34(2) the statutory content and form requirements under RCW 36.70C.070(4) do not divest the superior court of jurisdiction if not met, and (3) KWCR…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Overhulse Neighborhood Ass'n v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Lakeside Industries v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Knight v. City of YelmWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Nickum v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Lauer v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Lauer v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.