Legal Opinion
Lauer v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 8, 2010No. 38321-7-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
238 P.3d 539 (2010)
Louise LAUER and Darrell de Tienne, Respondents,
v.
PIERCE COUNTY; Mike and Shima Garrison and Betty Garrison, Appellants.
No. 38321-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 8, 2010.
Gregory Austin Jacoby, Jennifer Anne Irvine Forbes, McGavick Graves PS, Tacoma, WA, for Appellants.
Margaret Yvonne Archer, Attorney at Law, Christine D. Sanders, Gordon Thomas Honeywell LLP, Jill Guernsey, Pierce County Prosecutor's Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.
VAN DEREN, J.
¶ 1 A Pierce County hearing examiner granted Mike and Shima Garrison's application for a fish and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Watch v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- West Main Associates v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lauer v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Graham Neighborhood Ass'n v. F.G. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Graham Neighborhood Ass'n v. Fg Assoc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Kitsap Alliance v. Cent. Puget Sound GrowthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.