Legal Opinion
Conom v. Snohomish County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 2005No. 76082-9PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 C. Johnson, J.
This case requires us to determine whether a superior court is divested of jurisdiction to hear a land use petition if a party fails to note an initial hearing within seven days of serving the petition as required under RCW 36.70C.080(1). This case was dismissed by the trial court because the court found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the land use petition. We reverse and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
f 2 In November 2003, Tom and Ann Conom challenged an application for a rezone submitted by property owners, Robert and Barbara King, and a prospective developer, Carefree…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Chelan County v. NykreimWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Citizens To Preserve Pioneer Park, L.L.C. v. City of Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- PIONEER PARK v. Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Durland v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Michaels v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Knight v. City of YelmWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Durland v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Atlantic Cas. Ins. v. Oregon Mut. Ins.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.