Legal Opinion

G. R. Bolton, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 24, 1969No. R.D. 11644; Entry No. 220055PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

This reappraisement appeal concerns an importation by G. R. Bolton, Inc., hereinafter designated Bolton, of certain artificial flowers consisting of plastic garlands and leaves. The merchandise involved was exported from Hong Kong by Rayman Trading Co., Ltd., hereinafter called Rayman, on August 31, 1965. The importations here involved were entered at Los Angeles, California, by customhouse brokers James G. Wiley Co. Rayman is alleged to be a *869buying agent for Bolton. The merchandise was manufactured in Hong Kong, as shown by the invoice in evidence by plaintiffs as part of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Fine Arts Bag Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Manhattan Novelty Corp.United States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Dorco Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API