Legal Opinion

United States v. Manhattan Novelty Corp.

United States Customs Court

Decided December 4, 1969No. A.R.D. 263; Entry No. 817735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eosenstein, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment sustaining the importer’s claim and holding -that there was a bona fide buying commission of 5 per cent which was not a part of the dutiable value of the subject merchandise. Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 824, R.D. 11510 (1968), on rehearing from Id. v. Id., 54 Cust. Ct. 528, R.D. 10906 (1965).

The merchandise consists of transistor radios exported from Japan on or about 'September 30, 1960 and appraised on the basis of export value as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. United States v. Knit WitsUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. United States v. HerrmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  5. B & W Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorco Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Pier 1 Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Toro v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API