Fine Arts Bag Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Judge:
These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, involve handbags or baskets of reed or rattan, coated with polyvinyl chloride, exported from Hong Kong in 1961 and 1962.1 *626They were appraised on the basis of export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 'by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, at the invoiced unit values, plus the items marked “X,” that is, a so-called buying commission and charges for inland freight, insurance, storage, haulage, and lighterage. There is no dispute as to the proper basis of valuation, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Warner v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Morris v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- United States v. Gehrig, Hoban & Co.United States Customs Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- B & W Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Park Avenue Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- A & A Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- G. R. Bolton, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.