Legal Opinion

Rule v. Bennett

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1966No. 3790, 3791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge:

Margaret W. Rule sustained personal injury attributed to a fall in the hallway of an office building where she was employed by a tenant. The building was owned and operated jointly by Alfred L. Bennett, Bernard Gewirz and Charles I. Kaplan. She brought suit against them for damages allegedly caused by their negligence in the maintenance of the hallway floor. Among the defenses to the action, the owners asserted a complete release in writing from Mrs. Rule of all claims arising out of the fall. After trial, upon a special interrogatory submitted by the trial judge, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. McNamara v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1961
  4. Capital Transit Co. v. GambleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Wood v. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doe v. BinkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Vogel v. District of Columbia Office of PlanningDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Brown v. National Academy of SciencesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Furline v. MorrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Baker v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API