Legal Opinion
Vogel v. District of Columbia Office of Planning
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 2008No. 05-CV-186PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Mary Vogel is a former community planner with the District of Columbia Office of Planning (“OP”). She was terminated at the end of her probationary employment period. Vogel complained to the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights (“OHR”), which found that OP had retaliated against her for activity protected by the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”). OHR directed OP to reinstate Vogel with back pay. The Superior Court reversed OHR’s determination, finding that Vogel was not entitled to relief because she had not engaged in protected…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Broderick, Catherine v. Donaldson, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Caroline M. Sitar v. Indiana Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Craig v. Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hamilton v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Furline v. MorrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Propp v. Counterpart InternationalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lewis v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.