Legal Opinion

Wood v. Conneaut Lake Park, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, 143PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Plaintiff was seriously injured while riding a roller coaster in an amusement park owned and operated by defendant. He brought an action of trespass against *60defendant and a jury found a verdict in his favor in the amount of $75,000.

Defendant asks for judgment non obstante veredicto, which the Court below had denied. It is, of course, hornbook law that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, and he must be given the benefit of every reasonable inference of fact arising therefrom, but he is not entitled to inferences…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Schentzel v. Philadelphia National League ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Murray v. SiegalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Wagner v. Somerset County Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Mrahunec v. FaustiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Amon v. ShemakaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Taylor v. Churchill Valley Country ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Kresovich v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Flaherty v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API