Legal Opinion
Tibbets & Pleasant, Inc. v. Benedict
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 29, 1927No. 17460PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAOH, C.
Omer K. Benedict and Mae W. Benedict, husband and wife, sued the city of Tulsa and Tibbets & Pleasant, Inc., contractors, to recover damages to their dwelling house andi other improvements on their premises located in Ridgewood addition to the city of Tulsa, and alleged such damage to have been caused and suffered by the acts of the defendants in excavating for a city sewer in close proximity to plaintiffs’ premises, by blasting with and the use of explosives.
The court directed a verdict in favor of the city upon the grounds that plaintiffs had not given notice of the occurrence of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Smith v. MaherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Mills, Rec. v. HollinshedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kimmell v. GoehlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Jones v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma City v. Collins-Dietz-Morris Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Brown v. L. S. Lunder Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.