Legal Opinion
Manco of Fairmont, Inc. v. Town Board of Rock Dell Township
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 25, 1998No. CX-98-610PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge. *
The district court denied appellant’s petitions for mandamus because it concluded that respondent had complied with Minn.Stat. § 15.99.
FACTS
On September 2, 1997, appellant Manco of Fairmont applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) from respondent Town Board of Rock Dell Township (the township). Manco sought to increase its pig feedlot from 2,000 to 4,000 animal units. The township considered the application on September 24, 1997. The township was required under Minn.Stat. § 15.99, subd. 2 (1996), to render a decision or seek a continuance on the CUP within…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Phillips v. NeisenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Chandler v. KroissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Moreno v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Riehm v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.