Legal Opinion
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 2008No. A06-2291PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Appellant Harold Andrew Riehm challenges the district court’s order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license under the implied-consent law, alleging that Ramsey County’s policy of not scheduling implied-consent hearings until after disposition of the associated criminal matter violates Minn.Stat. § 169A.53, subd. 3(a) (Supp. 2005), and appellant’s procedural due-process rights.
FACTS
The facts underlying this appeal are not disputed. Appellant was arrested on October 27, 2005, for driving while impaired, and the arresting officer invoked the implied-consent law.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thole v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Reeves v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Williams v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013